We, don’t we, look into the looking: the vases
the faces the way we see it all staged
and placed in the right shade (it’s at least
as crucial, say, as light) the negative
space Matisse tried to make when painting
when claiming the stage of open places.
Do we, while looking into the looking,
plummet or ricochet? And which takes more
risk, discipline: the going deeper into
ourselves if the ricochet isn’t ricocheted
again or going deeper into them to find what
all it was that made us--God or chemistry
or cosmic star dust colliding and riding
all the way on the astral winds to where
we stand right now, what goes into it all or
what goes on and on and on? There are lovers
in this world who never ever touch, as if
their bodies were a monastery, as if walking
the vow of silence was how they made
love and instead of starting at the heart
or the middle of the brain (thought?) or,
that absurd cliché: crotch, it begins for them
in the jaw and along the line of muscle
that all night tightens unsettled unset, it is
the instrument begging to be tuned by the tips
(tongue, pivot) then fingers, lips, without
shapes taking up the habit of words. There’s just
sounds, no names, no OH, or AH, or MMM,
only maybe a growl, a rumble under the muscle,
a subtle pulse in that muscle in the monastery
of lovers. And in this I am one gone into
the fog on the rocks, necks and spines diving
down to low water. My monastery. See:
the back of me, not my face, unless you run
ahead of me and look back to wait--look into
the looking. Hmph. Let’s turn back
to the vase or the face (I’ll take the face)
Let’s bathe it slow and close so the quiver
of arrows in the jaw will drop like a camisole
to the floor--let’s kiss what’s been made
naked: the painted. Because doesn’t she
have to touch what paints her? fingertips
or lips? She has to, or what good, tell me,
is the paint? Or true, the eye? Are we such
hypocrites as to celebrate with our gawk
and then not call it art? What, where, why,
or when without touch? Without divine,
are we? What, really, are we seeing, lookingat?
No comments:
Post a Comment